材料准备原则

为便于申报人和推荐单位准备2026年度协会奖项提名材料，AIET秘书处根据现有奖项说明和后台材料要求，对近期咨询较集中的问题作统一说明。本说明用于帮助提交方理解材料结构，不替代具体奖项页面公布的资格条件和评审规则。

提名材料应围绕候选人的真实经历、可核验成果和与申报类别直接相关的贡献展开。无论采用自荐或推荐方式，材料中的职务、项目、论文、专利、标准、奖励和应用成效均应保持名称、时间及主体关系一致。对于暂不能公开的项目，可说明保密边界，但不应以无法验证的概括性评价代替必要事实。

常见问题

  • 如何选择类别：应根据候选人的主要贡献选择最匹配的奖项，不建议用同一组材料同时包装多个方向。
  • 成果清单如何整理：按时间或重要程度排列，并标明候选人在每项成果中的实际角色。
  • 证明材料是否越多越好：材料应以相关、清晰和可核验为原则，重复截图或无法说明来源的附件不会提升完整性。
  • 团队成果如何说明：需要区分团队整体贡献与候选人的个人职责，避免将集体成果全部归于个人。
  • 英文材料如何提交：中英文内容应保持事实一致，机构名称和专业术语优先采用正式或通行译法。

评审与回避

提名材料完成形式核验后，按协会现行评审流程进入相应环节。评审人员应遵守独立性和利益冲突回避要求；如评审人与候选人存在近期合作、直接利益关系或其他可能影响客观判断的情形，应按规定申报并回避。

秘书处负责材料接收、完整性检查和流程联络，不对候选人作预先承诺，也不会以补充宣传性文字代替评审所需证据。申请人如需更新材料，应以后台实际开放状态和具体通知为准，避免通过多个渠道重复提交不同版本。

提交前检查

建议提交前再次核对候选人姓名、申报类别、核心成果、时间信息、证明文件和联系方式。涉及第三方机构或合作项目的表述，应准确说明各方角色。奖项安排、评审进度和结果发布以协会奖项栏目后续正式信息为准。

Principles for Preparing Materials

To assist nominees and recommending organizations with the 2026 AIET Association Awards, the Secretariat has prepared consolidated guidance on questions frequently raised about nomination materials. This guidance explains how documents should be organized; the eligibility conditions and review rules published for each award remain controlling.

Submissions should be based on the nominee's documented experience, verifiable outcomes, and contributions directly relevant to the selected category. Whether a nomination is submitted by the candidate or by another party, positions, projects, publications, patents, standards, awards, and application outcomes should use consistent names, dates, and statements of responsibility. Confidential work may be described within appropriate limits, but broad claims should not replace the factual evidence required for review.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Choosing a category: select the award that most closely reflects the nominee's principal contribution rather than repackaging the same evidence for several directions.
  • Organizing outcomes: arrange them by date or significance and state the nominee's actual role in each item.
  • Amount of evidence: relevance, clarity, and verifiability matter more than volume. Repeated screenshots or attachments without a clear source do not improve a submission.
  • Team achievements: distinguish the contribution of the team from the individual responsibilities of the nominee.
  • English materials: Chinese and English versions should remain factually consistent, using official or established translations for institutions and technical terms.

Review and Recusal

After a completeness check, eligible nominations proceed through the applicable review process. Reviewers are required to observe independence and conflict-of-interest rules. A reviewer with recent collaboration, a direct interest, or another circumstance that may affect objective judgment should disclose the matter and recuse as required.

The Secretariat receives materials, checks completeness, and coordinates the process. It does not make advance commitments to candidates, and promotional language cannot substitute for review evidence. Any update to a submission should follow the actual system status and formal notice so that conflicting versions are not sent through multiple channels.

Final Check Before Submission

Applicants should verify the nominee's name, category, principal outcomes, dates, supporting documents, and contact information. References to third-party institutions or joint projects should describe each party's role accurately. Award arrangements, review progress, and publication of results are governed by subsequent formal information in the Association Awards section.